- JPMorgan and Goldman Sachs are selectively hiring again, focused mainly on senior investment bankers rather than broad-based expansion.
- Goldman is beefing up its middle-market team while still cutting 3–5% of staff and enforcing headcount limits under its OneGS and automation initiatives.
- JPMorgan has added over 100 managing directors but is tightly constraining junior and mid-level hiring in line with strict expense discipline.
- The result is rising competition and pay pressure at the top, continued strain and scarce openings for juniors, and uncertainty over whether deal momentum will justify wider hiring.
Read More
The recent hiring uptick at JPMorgan and Goldman Sachs reflects renewed dealflow—driven by M&A and some IPO activity—after a prolonged period of conservative staffing. However, the expansion is highly selective. In Goldman’s case, middle-market teams are being reinforced, implying opportunity in areas where deal frequency or complexity is improving, yet the firm continues to constrain overall headcount under its OneGS initiative and plans further cuts targeting VPs and operational “back-to-front” roles. [1][2]
At JPMorgan, the focus has been on recruiting senior bankers—more than 100 managing directors in global banking have been added since early 2024—often from rivals. But this senior hiring has not rippled down significantly to junior or associate levels. Even when open, junior roles are being filled cautiously, often requiring prior experience, and new roles are sometimes frozen or delayed. [1][3]
Compensation pressures at the top are likely to increase, particularly as experienced MD-level bankers are being poached cross-firm, and pay packages bid up where relationships and sector expertise are strong. Yet bonus expectations are tempered by timing: new senior hires will struggle to contribute revenue in time to impact year-end bonus pools. [1]
AI and efficiency initiatives play a central role in this cautious approach. Both firms view AI as an enabler of productivity and a justification for slowing or avoiding headcount growth in roles susceptible to automation—client onboarding, sales-enablement, administrative processes. [2][3] The combination of revenue pick-up plus structural cost discipline is resulting in a “grow smart” rather than “grow fast” mindset.
For junior bankers and those aspiring to enter, these dynamics are challenging. Expect more selective hiring, especially in markets outside New York/London, longer interview cycles, and fewer roles overall. Meanwhile, stress, overtime, and burnout likely remain serious concerns as workloads expand faster than staffing.
Open questions include: how durable is the current deal-making momentum? Will banks sustain profitability across fixed income and equity capital markets to support broader hiring? How aggressively will AI redesign roles and displace traditional staffing hierarchies? And will firms loosen hiring constraints if macroeconomic risks (rates, inflation, regulation) ease?
Supporting Notes
- Goldman Sachs is reported to be hiring again to strengthen its middle-market team; earlier autumn performance-based layoffs seem off the table. [1]
- JPMorgan has added roughly 100 senior bankers in the past year—the most it has added for some time. [1]
- Goldman Sachs plans to cut 3-5% of its staff in May 2025 (approx. 2,000 people), particularly targeting vice presidents. [2]
- The firm added just 100 net new people between Q1 2024 and Q1 2025 despite headcount cuts elsewhere. [2]
- JPMorgan’s CFO, Jeremy Barnum, emphasized “old-fashioned expense discipline” and noted the bank is “constraining headcount growth,” showing internal resistance to broad hiring. [3]
- Goldman’s OneGS 3.0 memo called for constrained growth and specified automation efforts in areas including sales enablement and client onboarding. [3]
- Junior roles across both banks show limited growth; many open positions are being delayed, or hiring is paused except in senior roles. [1][3]
- Even when revenue improves (e.g., Goldman’s Q1 2025 showing 15% return on equity, 28% net earnings growth yoy), headcount growth per head (compensation per head) rose only ~1%, indicating controlled hiring cost. [2]
Sources
- 1 www.efinancialcareers.com (eFinancialCareers) — 25 September 2025
- 2 www.efinancialcareers.com (eFinancialCareers) — 14 April 2025
- 3 www.efinancialcareers.com (eFinancialCareers) — 15 October 2025
