Hedge Fund SMAs Surge in Adoption: Trends, Risks & Strategies for 2025

  • Separately managed account (SMA) capital in hedge funds has surged to about $315 billion, making SMAs a core channel for institutional hedge fund exposure.
  • Large multi-manager hedge funds are rapidly ramping allocations to external portfolio managers via SMAs, signaling a structural shift in how talent and capital are matched.
  • Both emerging and established managers are embracing SMAs to meet investor demand for transparency, liquidity, customization and capital efficiency.
  • The boom is intensifying competition for talent and raising risks around deal terms, alignment and “shadow alpha” as allocators gain visibility into managers’ trades.
Read More

In 2024-2025, SMAs have shifted from fringe offerings to core components of hedge fund capital formation and deployment. A 27% year-on-year expansion to $315 billion in SMA capital reflects institutional investors’ appetite for investment structures combining the benefits of hedge fund alpha with operational flexibility and transparency [1].

Multi-manager firms are central to this trend. Nearly three-quarters of multimanagers were backing external portfolio managers by mid-2025, often via SMAs; this is a marked increase from 54% in 2022, underscoring a structural change in how capital is sourced and deployed [1]. This externalization allows those firms to access broader talent pools while maintaining scalability.

Emerging managers benefit disproportionately: SMAs have lowered barriers to entry compared to traditional commingled funds. Infrastructure and third-party platforms (e.g., Innocap) ramped up quickly, growing assets from ~$85B to over $100B in half a year and attracting strategic investors like sovereign wealth and PE firms [1].

However, as the space gets more crowded, strategic tensions have emerged. Portfolio managers are more careful about agreement terms: liquidity, exclusivity and transparency are being negotiated harder [1]. There’s also concern about “shadow alpha”—allocators mirroring trades, reducing value for SMAs [1]. Talent competition is heating as both established and emerging funds require analysts, ops staff, technologists, and leadership capable of managing SMA complexities [1].

Strategic implications for players:

  • Managers must modernize infrastructure (risk, compliance, execution) to offer SMAs efficiently.
  • Fee and term negotiation will increasingly center around non-capital value: alignment, transparency and protection against strategy dilution.
  • Capital providers (institutionals, family offices) will lean more toward wrappers allowing for control and customization; SMAs may capture institutional pools that historically went to commingled hedge funds or private equity.
  • Regulators and service providers may need to address operational risks (e.g., counterparty risk, custody, tax treatment) stemming from sprawling SMA adoption.

Open questions include whether the external PM allocation will saturate, reducing excess returns; whether SMAs will converge in terms of cost structure with commingled vehicles; and how global regulation (especially outside the US) will adapt to this surge in separately managed formats.

Supporting Notes
  • SMA capital rose 27% in 2024 to US$315 billion [1].
  • Institutions like Innocap saw platform assets climb from about US$85 billion in April to over US$100 billion six months later, with minority equity stakes sold to large investors [1].
  • By mid-2025, nearly 75% of multi-manager hedge funds had allocated capital to external portfolio managers, up from 54% in 2022; two-thirds of those external allocations have been made since 2024, nearly all via SMAs [1].
  • Emerging managers are increasingly launching SMAs, and even well-established hedge funds are opening them up, due in part to investor demand [1].
  • Shadow alpha is a growing concern: allocators could internally replicate SMA trades, which can erode alpha for the SMA manager [1].
  • Talent competition is intensifying, making it harder for smaller or new funds to hire for research, tech, operations roles [1].

Sources

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search
Filters
Clear All
Quick Links
Scroll to Top